Former Senator Mike Gravel of Alaska at the Presidential Debate in South Carolina last week:
« March 2007 | Main | May 2007 »
Former Senator Mike Gravel of Alaska at the Presidential Debate in South Carolina last week:
Posted on Monday, 30 April 2007 at 08:25 PM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
The Daily Reel reports on a surprising survey:
A study by Marketing Sherpa and the Online Publishers Association found that less than 10% of online video viewers in the U.S. frequently recommended clips to their friends, while 62% said they rarely or never recommended videos.
But the numbers might not be as negative as they seem for advertisers who are hoping their viral videos spread the word about their products, writes Jordan McCollum at WebProNews. As Malcolm Gladwell showed in The Tipping Point, there is a small minority of "influencers" whose rampant sharing of cultural and product information has a big affect on others. They might just be that 9% who frequently share.
Read more here.
Posted on Monday, 30 April 2007 at 08:21 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Mashable takes stock of "Porn 2.0":
Our unemployed friends tell us that the latest “Porn 2.0″ site to see unprecedented growth is YouPorn, a pornographic version of YouTube (not work safe, but no adult material on the frontpage).
We’re told that the company is growing like crazy, and frequently has trouble keeping the site up, no pun intended. Although we couldn’t source internal stats, the Alexa figures suggest that YouPorn is set to overtake its rival Pornotube in the next few days. Compete disagrees, but YouPorn claims that most of its success is in Germany and other European countries - something that won’t show up on the US-only stats from Compete.
Do we really need to tell you what it does? It’s YouTube for porn, so you can probably guess the functionality. It’s another example of the porn industry copying existing sites, rather than leading the pack as many assume. The next multi-million dollar idea for those who aren’t concerned about havign an immaculate reputation? May we suggest an adult version of Ustream.tv?
Read more here.
Posted on Monday, 30 April 2007 at 08:12 PM | Permalink | Comments (17) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
The Daily Reel takes a look eyeVio:
The electronics and entertainment company [Sony] is launching a new online video network today in Japan (and then later abroad) that it hopes will rival YouTube.
Reuters reports that eyeVio users will have the option of choosing who will be able to see their video content, and for how long. The company says that, unlike its presumptive competitor, it will closely monitor uploads for copyright infringement.
Such a model would appeal to companies looking to release content and to protect their image, said Sony spokesman Takeshi Honma.
"We believe there's a need for a clean and safe place where companies can place their advertisements," Honma said.
Read more here.
Posted on Monday, 30 April 2007 at 07:58 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Blawg IT is hosting Blawg Review #106. Read it here.
In particular, host Brett Trout highlights a couple of particularly interesting posts:
Marty Schwimmer of The Trademark Blog summarizes the list of most valuable trademarks in the world ... Professor and cyber copyright visionary Lawrence Lessig eulogizes the late Hollywood icon and model of a man, Jack Valenti ... Think you know who owns the copyright the Virginia Tech killer video? You might think again after reading the Volokh Conspiracy post. Law student Scott Felsenthal discusses the legality of Peer-to-Peer file sharing systems, like Limewire, under current copyright laws ... Jeff Lipshaw gives a great summary of the top ten reasons Lawyers should take up knitting.
Again, read the entire Blawg Review here.
Posted on Monday, 30 April 2007 at 07:43 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Slate asks will the real Anthony Kennedy please stand up?
Kennedy is what Justice O'Connor used to be—the swing vote on a court balanced between a hard-right bloc and a moderate-centrist bloc. But where O'Connor could be unpredictable, Kennedy is all but inexplicable.
Read more here.
Posted on Monday, 30 April 2007 at 07:23 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
The lawsuits against MySpace are well known, but Mashable has a fascinating post on who MySpace has sued:
We frequently hear that MySpace is being sued - most recently by parents - but MySpace has also taken action against plenty of users who are abusing the site.
MySpace has always offered a rich platform for small and large business to advertise with but several companies have had to face MySpace in court for their efforts. While co-founder Tom Anderson has been quoted encouraging promotion on MySpace, many users have taken this freedom too far. Be it from fake profiles or tidal waves of unsolicited messages the results are the same: degradation of the community and poor user experience.
The action action against “Spam King” Sanford Wallace is well known, but here are some other cases that went largely unnoticed in ‘06 and ‘07 (some resolved very recently) ...
Read the rest here (including copies of documents relating to the cases).
Posted on Monday, 30 April 2007 at 07:11 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
From News.com.au:
A WOMAN'S email to the help desk of Telecom New Zealand was rejected by a computer system because her name was Gay and "inappropriate for business-like communication".
Gay Hamilton, from the northern South Island town of Nelson, said while she was actually gay, she was concerned that the country's biggest public company was spending its time and resources on trifling issues, the Herald on Sunday reported.
"If they do have to put content filters on, then maybe they should ensure that it only gets genuinely abusive words," she said.
Telecom's automated reply to her email said the message "was identified by our content filtering processes as containing language that may be considered inappropriate for business-like communication". It confirmed that the offending word was "gay".
Read more here.
Posted on Monday, 30 April 2007 at 07:09 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Over the last two months, this blog has followed the rise and rise of Twitter (see, for example, here, here, here and here), so it should come as no surprise that other social networking sites are adopting Twitter's defining feature. Mashable has had a couple of posts about this trend ...
On Bebo:
Bebo has launched a feature that also emulates Twitter’s functionality. The name of the feature is “What are You Doing?”, which Twitter users will recognize as the Twitter slogan. Subtle.
![]()
Bebo’s “What are You Doing” provides 140 characters (same as Twitter) in which to say what you are doing, plus a countdown to say how many characters you have left. There’s an aggregated page that shows all the messages from around your network, too. All that’s missing: SMS integration. However, Bebo has already partnered with an SMS service for the creation of the Veronica’s Widget, and I don’t imagine they’ll have trouble adding SMS support if the feature takes off (which it certainly will).
The nature of innovation is that everyone borrows from everyone else, so where is the line drawn?
Read more here.
On Facebook:
If all that self-obsessed Tweeting was starting to irritate you, don’t fear - Facebook now provides the same service.
The thing is, Facebook was practically the same as Twitter already - the site’s “status updates” allowed you to tell your friends what you were doing at any moment. So while Steve Rubel speculated a while back that Facebook might look to snap up Twitter, it was a minor change to enable the posting - and reading - of status updates via SMS. That’s the feature they just dropped in over the weekend, along with a status updates page that’s pretty much identical to your Twitter friends view. It’s a move that kills off any possibility of a link up between the two.
Read more here.
All this leads to two questions. First, when will other social networking sites like MySpace incorporate a similar service? Second, will anyone want to buy Twitter when you can just steal the idea?
Posted on Monday, 30 April 2007 at 07:06 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
The Washington Post has a fun piece on celebrity ringtones - you can even listen to some of the preferred tunes. Check it out here.
Posted on Monday, 30 April 2007 at 08:53 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Not much to link to today ...
Posted on Monday, 30 April 2007 at 08:43 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
From News.com.au:
THE "ghost" of former Labor leader Mark Latham spooked some ALP MPs as they arrived for the final sessions of the party's national conference today.
Julian Morrow, of ABC's The Chaser, donned a white sheet with Mr Latham's face sketched on the front to warn Labor politicians they faced a scary election campaign this year.
"Are you happy to see me? Remember the last election," the ghost whispered to human services spokeswoman Tanya Plibersek as her two young children cowered behind her.
Intrigued, Ms Plibersek stopped to confide that she still had nightmares about Labor's loss at the 2004 federal poll.
"Wait for the campaign, it's going to be so scary," the ghost continued, before asking her to let him into the conference centre.
But Ms Plibersek wasn't tempted to be responsible for the controversial former Labor leader's ghost floating around the conference floor.
"Why not? I used to be a star," the ghost retorted, before Ms Plibersek reminded him that he was "the ghost of campaigns past".
The ghost's final advice to her was: "Remember to keep a diary Tanya. Good luck with the conference, you are going to need it."
Read it here.
Posted on Sunday, 29 April 2007 at 02:01 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Posted on Sunday, 29 April 2007 at 11:00 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Media Guardian's Viral Video chart this week is themed "funny", and the number one video is the Marge Simpson video I embedded during the week (see here). Number two is Will Ferrell, who has become something of a YouTube star over the last month, but that video is no longer available through YouTube. The top ten also features some old Boris Yeltsin clips (see here and here), but the highlights of the chart this week (in my biased opinion) are to be found at number 10 and at number 17.
Number 10 is a useful community service announcement, Why you don't throw paperclips at coworkers. It has to be a set-up, but it is very funny:
Number 17 is so bad it's funny, Batman: Defenders of the Night:
View the full chart here.
Posted on Saturday, 28 April 2007 at 05:31 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Twitter has posted this to the Twitter blog:
Update: To clarify, we're getting a new access number for Australia—as soon as we get the number, sms service will be back in action. We're working on it right now and it's a high priority.
Australian users please take note! If you currently use Twitter via your mobile device instead of over IM or the Web we have some news. Right now, Twittering via sms in Australia is more expensive than it needs to be—for you and for us. Our short term solution is to suspend sms support for Australian users.
When sms support for Australia returns it will be better all around. We'll let you know as soon as it does. In the meantime, we recommend using Twitter over IM, Web, Twitterrific, or any of these interesting alternatives.
Read it here. Frustrating ... well, it would be if I was still regularly using Twitter. Although I found Twitter a great way to stay in touch with everyone while I was travelling overseas, I haven't really used it much since I've been back. And as I haven't been inundated with requests to keep Twittering, I'm inclined to just Twit occasionally, or only when I travel.
Posted on Saturday, 28 April 2007 at 05:01 PM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
From Wired:
A hapless French driver was so proud of his video taken of him speeding at over 140 mph in a 62-mph zone that he posted his exploit on Youtube. The problem is that French cops, albeit hated by many, can also be very clever, too ...
According to the press reports, the police found the driver by plugging in his first name listed in his YouTube video title "Loïc et Sa Trottinette" and the make of his car in Meurthe-et-Moselle where the vid was taken. Unfortunately for the driver, there was only one Loic who owned the car in this town and he was promptly charged with negligence and endangering the lives of others.
Read more here.
Posted on Saturday, 28 April 2007 at 03:23 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Media Post (and others) are reporting that YouTube is planning to introduce pre-roll and post-roll ads:
YouTube is testing video ads with the aim of rolling them out more broadly this summer, Chief Marketing Officer Suzie Reider said this week at the Ad:Tech conference in San Francisco.
The exact form these ads will take continues to evolve, but the company for now is testing pre- and post-roll ads.
Read more here.
I feel this may be a mistake for two reasons. First, directly tying advertisements to videos means YouTube may lose their safe harbor under section 512(c) DMCA (assuming, for the moment, that they do currently fall within the safe harbor). EFF senior staff attorney Fred von Lohmann outlined this problem in a piece for The Hollywood Reporter, Esq last year:
A hosting provider also loses the safe harbor if it "receives a financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity, in a case in which the service provider has the right and ability to control such activity."
Here's where things might get a bit sticky for YouTube. Some have argued that this may restrict the kinds of advertising business models that YouTube (and other video hosting services) might want to pursue, as ads tied too closely to an infringing video could be viewed as creating a "financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity."
Read more here. Pre-roll or post-roll advertising would be a "financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity", which means that YouTube will need to be very careful and selective about which videos contain pre-roll or post-roll advertising.
Second, putting ads, no matter how short, on the videos - especially pre-roll - is a move likely to alienate many of YouTube's users, potentially driving them to one of the numerous other online video sites that do no have such obstrusive advertising. Media Post's Just an Online Minute explains why this proposed model is flawed:
This model, however, appears to have serious flaws. While a three-second pre-roll might be short enough that it won't slow down users too much, any sort of mid-roll ad sounds like the type of thing that will cause viewers to quickly click away.
Online ads that are proven to work well -- like Google's search ads -- do so in part because they don't interfere with users' activities. Yes, the ads are shown in prominent positions on the results' pages, but users who wish to ignore them can do so. The key is that users control whether or not to view the ad. What's needed is to extend that principle to online video ads, rather than trying to interrupt clips with TV-style commercials.
Read more here.
Posted on Saturday, 28 April 2007 at 02:57 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
10 Zen Monkeys has compiled a list of the ten best Pulp Fiction parodies on YouTube. You can check out the whole list here, but here are a few of my favourites ...
(Hat tip: Reel Pop.)
Posted on Saturday, 28 April 2007 at 02:09 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Codehunters, a superb digital short created by the UK's Blinkink and directed by Ben Hibon, was originally created for MTV Awards Asia 2006 and is now up for a Webby award in the arts and animation category.
(Hat tip: Reel Pop.)
Posted on Saturday, 28 April 2007 at 01:55 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
The Australian has some profiles today of two Australians who will play an increasingly influential and important role in the Australian media - Donald McDonald and Mark Scott.
Donald McDonald has recently been named director of the Classification Board:
THE new chief censor, Donald McDonald, once responded so dramatically to a film he had seen that he made a "public embarrassment" of himself.
The film was Bambi, and a very young Donald had to be taken out of the cinema after he began sobbing uncontrollably at the death of the fawn's mother.
More than 60 years later, the new head of the board that oversees the rating classification of about 1500 publications, 400 films and 6000 videos every year admits there are films he watches "through my eyelashes".
Read more here.
Mark Scott is the new managing director of the ABC:
ON the face of it, Mark Scott could easily be seen as the ABC's worst nightmare. He is an American-born, Harvard-educated, evangelical Christian who has worshipped at the Christian City mega-church in Sydney's north, with a 5000-strong congregation.
Although he does not identify as a conservative, he has worked for Liberal politicians and, before he put up his hand to become the ABC's managing director a year ago this month, Mr Scott had no broadcast experience. He had come fresh from the newspaper publisher Fairfax, a company that was then - and is now - reeling from sliding circulation, staff cuts and strikes.
Given this background, it is perhaps understandable that some ABC staff were wary - no, freaked - by Mr Scott's appointment. But, as revealed in interviews with The Weekend Australian and The Weekend Australian Magazine today, Mr Scott, 43, appears to be generating goodwill, even as he talks about a more commercial future for the beloved, commercial-free Aunty.
Posted on Saturday, 28 April 2007 at 01:30 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
One of the most closely guarded secrets before Kevin Rudd's speech to the ALP Conference yesterday was what theme song would announce Rudd when we walked on stage. Although there were numerous theories, the song selected was one no-one would have guessed - A Change in the Weather. Not sounding too familiar? Well, that would be because it was specially commissioned for Rudd's speech. And unfortunately the song was a bit like the speech - and perhaps a bit like Rudd too - ambitious and well-intentioned, but contrived and ultimately underwhelming. The Australian has the audio of A Change in the Weather here.
Posted on Saturday, 28 April 2007 at 11:41 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
The chief architect of Sony's flagship PlayStation game console will retire in June as the company struggles to retain dominance in the video game industry and revive its flagging reputation as an electronics and entertainment pioneer. Ken Kutaragi, 56, an icon among gamers, will step down as Sony Computer Entertainment's chairman and group chief executive, Tokyo-based Sony said. He will be replaced by Kazuo Hirai, who is now president and chief operating officer of the division. Read more here (from the Sydney Morning Herald).
Posted on Saturday, 28 April 2007 at 11:08 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
From the New York Post:
THE controversial SocialiteRank.com Web site - which rated young New York women on the parties they attended, the borrowed dresses they wore, and how many of their photos were published - is shutting itself down under threat of legal action.
A posting on the site yesterday said the yearlong "experiment" was ending because of its success and because its anonymous author planned to write a book about the experience, to be titled "The Year of the Rank."
...
The site's posting yesterday claimed its "staff" consisted of "three full-time writers, one designer and seven contributors." It also said its purpose was to eventually "create a book that would definitively showcase the inner workings of New York's 10021 world."
Cinema Society founder Andrew Saffir, who throws parties attended by socially aspiring young women eager to pose for photos, congratulated the site's creators, whoever they are, for taking "something that should have made a mere ripple and turning it into a tidal wave." But he wondered if the book idea "is really smoke and mirrors, [to distract attention from] a looming lawsuit."
Every woman who's featured on SocialiteRank.com claims to be mortified by it, but many have benefited from the publicity. One party regular told Page Six, "The pathetic girls will be sad they can't see pictures of themselves every day, but the legitimate socialites will be happy to see it go."
Read more here.
Posted on Saturday, 28 April 2007 at 11:01 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
From Media Post's Just an Online Minute:
The collaborative encyclopedia Wikipedia has become one of the most popular sites on the Web, according to a report issued this week by the Pew Internet & American Life Project.
Eight percent of American Web users visited Wikipedia during a typical day this winter -- a higher proportion than those who made an online purchase, visited a dating site or chat room during a typical day, according to Pew.
Wikipedia was especially popular with users who were young, affluent and educated, according to Pew, which surveyed 1,492 Internet users earlier this year. Fifty percent of respondents who had graduated from college said they had used Wikipedia, compared to 22% who only had high school diplomas. Forty-two percent of those with household incomes of more than $75,000 used the online encyclopedia, compared to 32% with household incomes of less than $30,000. And 44% percent of those 18-29 had used the site, versus 26% of those 65 and older.
Separately, The New York Times reported this week that the site logged more than 750,000 visits to the article about the shootings on April 16-17, according to the foundation that runs it. The Roanoke Times went so far as to characterize the site a "clearinghouse for detailed information on the event," according to the New York Times.
As happened with other crises, like the tsunami in late 2004, a tragedy sparked intense reliance on the site. What's more, despite the obvious potential for anarchy at Wikipedia, the information there proved useful and accurate.
Still, while Wikipedia relies on collective input from citizen editors, their task is to aggregate information that's been reported or originally produced by others. In other words, Wikipedia isn't replacing the professionals; it's just quickly and efficiently harnessing their work.
Read it here.
Posted on Friday, 27 April 2007 at 09:01 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Posted on Friday, 27 April 2007 at 07:04 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
The latest from Liberal Viewer:
Posted on Thursday, 26 April 2007 at 10:07 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
PC World has a fascinating and comprehensive look at the various search engines available today. Here is PC World's summary:
Not many brands become verbs, as in "I googled [fill in the blank] last night." Nielsen/NetRatings' January 2007 report found that more than half of all Web queries in the United States in that month went through Google. The second-most-popular engine, Yahoo Search, garnered less than half that amount.
Which led us to wonder: Does Google deserve all that traffic, or is it living off its reputation? Are people using it because they're not aware of other, potentially better search engines? To find out, we pitted Google against its big-name competitors, Yahoo and Microsoft Live Search, as well as against smaller challengers such as AlltheWeb, AltaVista, and Ask.com--plus a couple dozen of the specialty search services, including Blogdigger, Picsearch, and TubeSurf.
Our verdict? Google is indeed the best search engine, even though two other services topped it--barely--in our text-search tests. Google's index proved to be the most accurate, comprehensive, and timely of the bunch. It also bested the majority of the specialty-search sites we tried, meaning those that focus on a category or file type, such as videos, images, news, blogs, or local info delivered on a mobile phone.
Recent enhancements to Live Search's mobile component moved that service into the lead in our test searches for local information, although you have to navigate manually to its mobile-optimized site rather than being redirected automatically when you log in from a cell phone or other handheld device (see our charts throughout this story for details).
That said, the competition is fierce--and Google had better stay on its toes. Its challengers are implementing some innovative tools and interface upgrades (Ask.com is particularly impressive in this area) that enhance the user experience and deliver more relevant information than do the standard ten blue links on a results page. We also like several useful tools that can help you go beyond the basics of search.
Read the full investigation here.
Posted on Thursday, 26 April 2007 at 08:50 PM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
According to Ars Technica, 80% of blogs contain "offensive" content:
Blogs are known to be a free-for-all for "expressive" content, but according to a new report by ScanSafe, a vast majority of blogs host content that is considered "offensive" and potentially "unwanted." ScanSafe's Monthly "Global Threat Report" for March 2007 says that up to 80 percent of blogs host offensive content, ranging from "adult language" to pornographic images. The company suggests that businesses should be aggressive about preventing users from accessing some or all of this material. And of course, they'd hope that you'd use their products to do so.
Read more here. How do they come up with such a ridiculous figure? Well, here's the problem:
A blog merely has to contain a single instance of profanity to be considered offensive, according to ScanSafe. "There were as many blogs with the 'F-word' as the word 'China'," Nadir told Techworld.
Now this blog uses profanity occasionally (for example, I remember getting complaints about this post), but I'd hardly call this blog offensive. Am I wrong? Or should your work be aggressive about preventing you from accessing this blog?
(Hat tip: Volokh Conspiracy.)
Posted on Thursday, 26 April 2007 at 08:43 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
From The Age:
It was always just a matter of time before Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales had a run-in with The Chaser.
Andrew Hansen, one of five stars of the hit satirical ABC television program, ambushed Wales's question-and-answer session at the education.au conference in Sydney this morning.
Wales had just finished giving his keynote speech at the Hilton hotel, during which he brought the audience of about 150 educators up to speed on the ins and outs of Wikipedia and his newer for-profit venture, Wikia.
He explained how his collaborative online encyclopedia, which has copped significant flack of late over the apparent ease at which anyone can add erroneous and libellous information, was best used by teachers and students - as a source of background information, rather than a quoteable reference.
Given Wales's widely publicised goal of giving "every single person on the planet free access to the sum of all human knowledge", Hansen evidently thought Wales would be a prime candidate for The Chaser's "Mr Ten Questions" segment.
"Ah, Jimmy, um, look I just have 10 questions," Hansen said when he was handed the microphone during the question-and-answer session.
"First, how are you enjoying Australia?
"Second, how do our computers compare to the ones in America?
"Third, why does everyone in IT look so nerdy, yet you look like a daytime soap star?
"Fourth, Mac or PC - do you really give a shit?
"Fifth, there are 1.7 million articles on Wikipedia; how long did it take you to write them all?
"Sixth, Craig Reucassel's a bit unhappy with the photo on his page. Could you upload a better one maybe for him?
"Seventh, my dog is getting some scabs under his chin. I don't know if you can bring him in the number of a local vet?
"Eighth, Jessica Rowe and Peter Overton - will it last?
"Ninth, cracked pepper?
"Tenth, how do you feel about the fact that when I looked you up on Wikipedia this morning I changed your page to say that you were a teenage drug lord from Malaysia?"
In his usual style, Hansen asked each question in rapid succession, pausing to let Wales respond only when he had finished asking all 10.
Wales's nervous, confused facial expressions were a stark contrast to his typically dauntless demeanour, but he attempted to answer some.
His responses were not delivered into the microphone and so could be heard only by those sitting at the front of the room.
"Not such a nerd as I thought - oh well, you got four out of 10. I'll add that to your Wikipedia page thank you," Hansen said before leaving the room.
Read more here.
Posted on Thursday, 26 April 2007 at 08:05 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
The Queensland University of Technology is pleased to announce the Legal Framework for e-Research Conference:
International e-Research Conference Supporting All Disciplines
"from the sciences to the humanities"
Do you use the Internet for research? Collaborate with colleagues and workmates via email? Store data on a shared network or in a repository?
If you answered ‘yes’ to any of the above then you are involved in e-Research.
e-Research now has widespread application and supports all disciplines from the sciences to the humanities. Collaborative innovation is being made possible through user-friendly advances in information and communications technology. In reality e-Research capabilities magnify the potential of the established research paradigm rather than replace it.
This conference aims to analyse the legal framework necessary to ensure the effective take up of e-Research techniques in Australia. The conference program will address issues, including:
- Research contracts
- Data sharing
- Patent licensing
- Privacy
Join guest speakers from UK, USA, Canada and Australia for expert advice from a diversity of fields, including:
- Human Genome Technology transfer
- Cyber Infrastructure
- Child Health Research
- Social Sciences
Date: Wednesday 11 & Thursday 12 July
Venue: Surfers Paradise Marriott Resort and Spa, Gold Coast Queensland
Cost: $295 (Early Bird registration up to 18 May 2007); $385 (Registration after 18 May 2007)
Registration: www.e-Research.law.qut.edu.au
For further details see the date claimer and conference program.
Posted on Thursday, 26 April 2007 at 07:37 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Lawrence Lessig and others have called on the Republican National Committee and the Democratic National Committee to eliminate unnecessary regulation of political speech. From the Lessig blog:
While many rightly and fairly struggle over genuinely difficult copyright questions, it has been the strategy of some of us to push for solutions to obvious problems first. The place of copyright in political debate is one such obvious problem. Technology has exploded the opportunity for people to comment upon, and spread political speech. Democracy is all about encouraging citizens to participate in that debate. And all of us, whether Democrats or Republicans, should push to remove unnecessary burdens to that participation.
Unfortunately, however, the uncertainty about the scope of copyright regulation is increasingly one such burden on Internet political speech. This next political cycle will see an explosion of citizen generated political content. Some of that speech will be crafted from clips taken from the Presidential debates. Some of that will be fantastically valuable and important. Yet as the law is right now, it is extremely difficult for an ordinary citizen to understand the boundaries of “fair use,” or the limits to copyright law. It is likewise difficult for companies such as YouTube, or Blip.tv. Indeed, it is even difficult for a skilled practitioner. That uncertainty, if not checked, could produce a cloud over much of this political speech, as sites and universities don’t know how much is too much. It will certainly create a temptation by some politicians to invoke copyright law to block particularly effective speech critical of them.
Some friends (old and new) and I are therefore calling upon both major political parties to make this problem go away. Not by changing the law, or by supporting some expensive and time consuming litigation. But instead, by simply promising to require of any network broadcasting Presidential debates (at least) that they license the debates freely after they are initially broadcast — either by putting the debates into the public domain, or by permitting anyone to use or remix the contents of those debates, for any reason whatsoever, so long as there is attribution back to any purported copyright holder. (CC-BY)
I am confident that I won’t like much of what this freedom will engender. But if that were a legitimate reason to regulate political speech, this would be a very different world. We should all, regardless of our political persuasion, be encouraging a wide ranging debate about our political future. And we all need to hear more from those with whom we disagree.
I am also hopeful that those typically on the other side of the many debates that we have had about copyright will recognize this proposal as one that strengthens copyright. The last thing a copyright system designed to produce incentives for authors and artists needs is to complicate judgments about “fair use” by accommodating speech that needs no real copyright protection at all. There is incentive enough for politicians to debate, and opportunity enough for broadcasters to carry those debates. We don’t need to add the complexity of a lawyer driven speech regulation into this mix.
Thanks to everyone who signed and helped to get others to sign. Please call the RNC/DNC to add your view.
Posted on Thursday, 26 April 2007 at 05:51 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Posted on Thursday, 26 April 2007 at 05:41 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
An interesting article from Peter Yu:
Yu, Peter K., "Ten Common Questions About Intellectual Property and Human Rights" . Georgia State University Law Review, Vol. 23, 2007 Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=979193
Abstract: With the continuous expansion of intellectual property rights, there is a growing need to develop a human rights framework for intellectual property rights. Such a framework is not only socially beneficial, but will enable the development of a balanced intellectual property system that takes human rights obligations into consideration. Developing such a framework, however, is not easy. It sparks many difficult questions; some of them are foundational, some of them conceptual, and the remainder implementational. This Article tackles in turn ten questions the Author frequently encounters in discussing the development of a human rights framework for intellectual property rights. It is his hope that a better understanding of the answers to these questions will help promote a constructive and healthy discourse of the human rights bases of and implications for intellectual property rights.
The ten questions the Article addresses are: (1) Are intellectual property rights human rights? (2) Besides access to medicines, are there other intellectual property issues that implicate the protection of human rights? (3) Should the human rights debate separate patents from copyrights? (4) Are all forms of intellectual property rights human rights? (5) Can corporations claim protection of the right to the protection of interests in intellectual creations? (6) Does the right to private property already protect interests in intellectual creations? (7) Can human rights interests be built into the intellectual property system? (8) Will the human rights framework ratchet up existing intellectual property protection? (9) Will the human rights framework benefit indigenous peoples and traditional communities? (10) Will the human rights framework benefit less developed countries?
Posted on Thursday, 26 April 2007 at 05:36 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (1)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Posted on Thursday, 26 April 2007 at 05:33 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
The latest online/social networking tool that the US Presidential candidates are using appears to be Eventful. The Eventful website says:
Discover, share, and create grassroots political events. Get involved! Demand your favorite candidates come to your town.
techPresident is now tracking Eventful demands:
While each campaign is trying to galvanize its support base, something new is happening online: grassroots supporters of the candidates are using a new tool from Eventful.com, an events database, to request, or "demand" in Eventful's parlance, that the candidate come to their city. So far, no candidate has directly responded to this bottom-up aggregation of voter attention, but several have adopted their Eventful pages. Could this be the first sign of "candidate-relationship management" from below?
Democrats # of demands Obama 10,062 Clinton 3,497 Edwards 1,386 Richardson 15 Kucinich 6 Biden 3 Dodd 0
Republicans # of demands Paul 1,583 Giuliani 86 McCain 82 Romney 31 Brownback 23 Tancredo 2 Gilmore 1 Huckabee 0
Visit Eventful here.
Posted on Thursday, 26 April 2007 at 05:28 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
The East China University of Politics and Law (ECUPL) and the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) are pleased to announce an international forum on the digital content industry to be held at ECUPL in Shanghai, China, from 28 and 29 May 2007:
In recent times information technologies such as the world-wide web and broadband have transformed economic and social relations, minimising cultural and economic barriers. In our post-industrial, information-based society, knowledge or the production of information is increasingly replacing industrial technologies as the driving force of society. The convergence of technologies such as computers, communication and broadcasting, promises to fundamentally alter the global landscape.
The "National Strategy of Informatisation of China (2006-2020)" has extended the Information Technology Industry in China into the Information Content Industry by its emphasis on goals such as establishing advanced Internet culture and exploiting information resources more efficiently. Following years of development, China has entered an all-round, multi-level period of informatisation. China now faces the serious challenge of building an effective development policy, legal framework and industry order which will enable China’s digital content industry to prosper.
As part of the intellectual property (IP) Research Collaboration Program established by ECUPL and QUT, this Forum will provide a platform for academics, practitioners and consultants from industry and government to discuss key legal and policy developments in relation to the Content Industry and Intellectual Property in China and Australia.
Day 1 of the Forum will focus on Content Industry Policy and the Networked Information Economy.
Day 2 of the Forum will focus on Copyright Law, New Media and the Future.
Download more information here.
Posted on Thursday, 26 April 2007 at 02:26 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
The Attorney-General Philip Ruddock issued this media release this afternoon:
Australia will mark World Intellectual Property Day by joining two international treaties aimed at boosting copyright protection for material on the Internet, Attorney-General Philip Ruddock said today.
The move will complement the world's best practice copyright regime that Australia now has, after the Government's reforms of last year.
The Attorney-General said the World Intellectual Property Organisation Copyright Treaty and the World Intellectual Property Organisation Performances and Phonograms Treaty, otherwise known as the WIPO Internet Treaties, would be acceded to in Geneva
The main feature of the treaties is the protection of copyright works, sound recordings and performances fixed in sound recordings within the online environment.
They were adopted at a WIPO diplomatic conference in 1996, at which Australia played an active role.
Australia was one of the first countries to implement the treaties with the Digital Agenda reforms to the Copyright Act in 2000.
Australia's move to join the WIPO Internet Treaties reinforces international co-operation and promotes effective protection of copyright in the online environment," Mr Ruddock said.
"In the spirit of this year's theme for World IP Day - Encouraging Creativity - Australia is proud to join the WIPO Internet Treaties. Creativity is encouraged by an effective copyright regime, especially in the online environment.
"Consumers also benefit from online copyright protection because creators will make more material available online if it is protected from pirates."
World IP Day is an initiative of WIPO and is celebrated on April 26.
World IP day began in 2001. This year, WIPO is celebrating the link between intellectual property and creativity under the theme - Encouraging Creativity.
Posted on Thursday, 26 April 2007 at 12:37 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
From Reuters:
Up next: "American Idol" meets "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington."
Mark Burnett, the producer who popularized reality television, and Internet social network MySpace will unveil a new reality TV and Internet series that aims to groom one young politician or community leader to represent young America.
Politicians globally have put videos online and designed Web pages on MySpace and the YouTube video service, MySpace's new program, "Independent," has a similar objective: to engage young U.S. citizens -- in reverse.
To do this, "Independent" will let viewers decide the fate of contestants who submit audition videos on MySpace.
The program, expected to launch in early 2008, may be a way to spark interest in the political process among young adults, executives involved with the project said.
Read more here.
Posted on Thursday, 26 April 2007 at 10:30 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Posted on Thursday, 26 April 2007 at 10:04 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
The Utube Blog comes to a fun realisation:
“Hello, YouTube,” is a common greeting many people say on their videos. I’m struck by it because it’s almost as if YouTube has become a real person in these videos, the collective audience on YouTube. Now, John Edwards is saying it. Obviously, his speech writer is in tune with the YouTube lingo. Hello, YouTube.
Read it here.
Posted on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 at 05:43 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
The Utube Blog has news and analysis on NBC's decision to test out YouTube's deployment of content-identification software. Read it here.
Posted on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 at 01:48 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Check out this effective presentation from Zeus Jones on marketing in a Web 2.0 world (and take note of Slideshare - it is like a YouTube for presentations):
(Hat tip: Trevor Cook's Corporate Engagement.)
Posted on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 at 01:06 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
At the Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh has an interesting post on who owns the copyright in the Virginia Tech killer's video. Read it here.
Posted on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 at 12:50 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
The trailer for the Challenge of the Super Duper Friends is now online:
Visit the official website here.
The Daily Reel has more information:
Based on the classic Hanna-Barbera "Super Friends" animated series of the late 1970s, the updated "Challenge" pits several new Justice League members -- "The Green Solution" (Al Gore), "Captain United" (Barack Obama), "Reform-Girl" (Hilary Clinton), and "The Abitrator" (John Edwards) -- against an array of contemporary Legion of Doom baddies. In addition to "Doctor Spin," there's "Petro-Man" (George Bush), "9 Lives" (Condoleeza Rice) and "$" (Dick Cheney).
Posted on YouTube five days ago, the teaser trailer for "Challenge" has received about 30,000 hits and been favorited 97 times. The brainchild of Philippine blogger and comic book creator Jonas Diego, "Challenge" took about a month to make and was created off-hours by U.S. and Manila-based staffers at Interactive Art Services (IAS) Manila, Inc., one of the leading producers of storyboards and animatics for the US and UK advertising industry, where Diego works as studio director.
Read more here.
Posted on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 at 12:39 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Last month I blogged about the Electronic Frontier Foundation asking a US federal court to protect the free speech rights of MoveOn.org Civic Action and Brave New Films after their satirical send-up of The Colbert Report was allegedly removed from YouTube following a copyright complaint from Viacom (see here). SiliconValley.com now reports that the lawsuit has been dropped:
Activist groups dropped a federal lawsuit against Viacom Inc. on Monday after the parent of Comedy Central acknowledged it made a mistake by asking YouTube to yank a parody of the cable network's "The Colbert Report."
Although the video in question contained clips taken from the television show, the groups argued that their use was protected under "fair use" provisions of copyright law, and thus Viacom shouldn't have asked YouTube to remove the item.
Viacom initially denied requesting the removal but later acknowledged it and said it was in error.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation declared victory in announcing that Viacom agreed to add information on its Web site about its stance on such parodies and to set up an e-mail address to receive complaints about possible errors in the future.
Viacom, however, sought to play down its concessions, saying the lawsuit's dismissal was a recognition of "the effective processes we have consistently applied." In a statement, Viacom said the lawsuit "could have been avoided" had the groups contacted the company ahead of time.
Read more here. And here is the "offending" video:
Posted on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 at 11:33 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Posted on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 at 10:52 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
As a user of both MySpace and Facebook (as well as a few other social networking sites), I agree with Jimmy Wales:
Facebook, not MySpace, will be the long-term winner among the social networking sites, says Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales.
Mr Wales, in Adelaide yesterday at the start of a week-long Australian lecture tour, said Facebook was "actually useful" while MySpace was "horrible".
...
The value of Facebook is in its design, Mr Wales said.
"I think Facebook has a long way to go," he said. "It is really an interesting phenomenon and they really seem to know what they're doing. Facebook doesn't abuse their customers the way MySpace does. MySpace has so many ads blinking and flashing in your face, it's so horrible in every respect. Facebook has some ads but . . . they are in an appropriate place and they're not obnoxious."
Read more here (from the Sydney Morning Herald).
Posted on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 at 08:23 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Last weekend saw the annual White House Correspondents' Dinner, which usually features the President making of fun of himself followed by a hilarious comedian. Editor & Publisher thinks it didn't quite all go to plan this year:
What would the White House Correspondents Association dinner do for an encore on Saturday night in Washington following last year’s controversial Stephen Colbert routine? President Bush was back, but with impressionist Rich Little replacing the barbed satire of Colbert, and with the usual broad cast of celebrities -- from Reggie Bush to Condi Rice.
President Bush said, “We’ve got to learn to laugh in this town," but then instead of going into the usual jokes, surprised the crowd by saying, "I had looked forward to poking fun tonight but in light of this week’s tragedy at Virginia Tech, I decided not to try to be funny.”
He just said thanks for dinner and introduced Rich Little, “a talented and good man.” Little later told E&P that Bush had informed him earlier that he would not be doing any jokes himself.
Actually, one of the funniest jokes was Karl Rove being seated at a New York Times table.
Rich Little, with shockingly dyed hair, said at the outset that he is “not political” but rather a “nightclub performer who does a lot of dumb, stupid jokes,” then proved that.
Read more here, or watch for yourself and make up your own mind:
Posted on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 at 04:11 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
As today is my grandmother's 90th birthday, I thought I'd embed a video my sisters put together that celebrates 90 wonderful years ...
Posted on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 at 03:57 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Ok. I'll admit it. I watch Big Brother (well, at least the evictions) and follow the going-ons in the house on the Big Brother website and Behind Big Brother. I've even gone to a couple of live evictions. I've been following the show since year one, day one. And I enjoy it. I find the relationships, the characters, the politics, the games Big Brother plays and even Gretel Killen entertaining - and occasionally even insightful. Most of my so-called "intellectual" friends and colleagues consider that there must be something wrong with me (even though most are also able to follow a conversation about the show quite easily). However, I refuse to apologise for it. Big Brother isn't meant to change the world, but it is good TV.
And last night's episode of Big Brother was great TV - we got to select two new housemates, a relationship in the house were revealed, the reason for the mysterious White Room was disclosed, and Mr X was introduced to Australia and the unsuspecting housemates. If you have no idea what I'm talking about or think that this all sounds silly, then you are missing out. This season has been set up as possibly the best Big Brother ever. The housemates are older and more diverse (although still ridiculously good looking), the house has adopted a positive environmental stance, and most importantly, the first two episodes have shown that this season's Big Brother has a wonderfully wicked sense of humour. The housemates - and us - have absolutely no idea what Big Brother will throw at them next. Now, that is good TV.
As many of you reading this post will just dismiss it as a rant from a tragically deranged fan, may I suggest that if you are a reality TV sceptic you should read an excellent piece in one of your so-called "intellectual" magazines, The Atlantic Monthly by Michael Hirschorn, "The Case for Reality TV: What the snobs don't understand". Read it here.
So if you want to know what all the fuss is about, then you should watch this season of Big Brother. And enjoy it for what it is - good TV. Don't be embarrassed and don't apologise for it. After all, you don't have to tell people that you watch it ...
Posted on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 at 03:35 PM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This
| Save to del.icio.us
|
|
Recent Comments