Videos

« EFF: "Fair Use Principles for User Generated Video Content" | Main | Joss Whedon returns to TV »

Friday, 02 November 2007

Please Vote for Me!

The 2007 Weblog Awards

I am excited to have been selected as a finalist in the 2007 Weblog Awards in the Best Individual Blogger category.  As the ultimate winner will now be selected by popular vote, I would greatly appreciate it if you would click here and vote for me.  You can vote once every 24 hours up until 8 November  - so vote as often as you can! 

(I am up against some outstanding blogs, many with significantly more readers than my humble blog, so I'd love your support.  Thanks.)

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/870456/22979870

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Please Vote for Me!:

Comments

Congrats - Just voted for you!! All the best

Hey Peter, just popping in to say hello and congrats on making the finals. I'm one of your 8 counterparts getting their arses handed to them by Instapundit in the individual blogger category. I'm enjoying getting to know some great new blogs though. Good luck to you.

You're coming 4th as of now ;-)

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Daily News Links

    About the Author

    Connect With Me

    Bebo del.icio.us Digg Dopplr Facebook Flickr LinkedIn MSN Messenger MySpace Ning Orkut Pownce Skype StumbleUpon Technorati Twitter Upcoming Vox Yahoo! YouTube

    About this Blog

    • Archive
      View the full archive here.
    • Content
      This blog mainly covers issues relating to the legal regulation of the internet and the media, but at times Constitutional law issues and politics are discussed. And occasionally I get distracted and post on movies and TV. While the focus is on Australia, developments in other nations around the world are considered as well.
    • Background
      The title of this blog is inspired by the Opinion of the US Supreme Court in Board of Education v Barnette 319 US 624 (1943): "But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order."

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Facebook Application

    • You can add Freedom to Differ to your Facebook profile here.

    2007 Weblog Awards

    • The 2007 Weblog Awards

    Technorati